Hey {{first_name | there}},

Someone made a five-minute film in four and a half hours last month.

They didn't direct it. They didn't storyboard it. They typed a text description, hit go, and an agent handled the rest. 

Scripts, concepts, character sheets, image frames, video generation, background music, and a timeline exported directly to DaVinci Resolve.

The film was based on O. Henry's The Gift of the Magi.

The tools used: NanoBanana Pro for images, MiniMax Hailuo-02 for video, Suno for music, GPT-4o-mini-tts for voice.

The agent framework? Built by the creator themselves. A custom pipeline, not a commercial product.

That's not a stunt. That's a preview.

You might think that's just one creator messing around in their room. It's not.

This month, Tribeca is premiering "Dreams of Violets." A feature-length film made entirely with AI. 

No actors. No sets. It cost $2,000 for a full film at one of the world's biggest festivals.

OpenAI backed another AI film called "Critterz" that debuted at Cannes. And then there's "Killing Satoshi," starring Casey Affleck and Gal Gadot, where AI replaced what would have been $300 million worth of locations and visual effects. 

They shot the whole thing in 20 days on a bare stage with X marks where the backgrounds would go. AI filled in the rest.

You've probably heard people say AI can’t replace creative fields. But now? We can’t be so sure.

If you've been paying attention to how developers adopted Claude Code, giving it a task, walking away, coming back to review rather than write, you're watching the exact same shift happen in video production right now.

Dreamina just launched OCTO. It's an agent that takes a minimal brief and handles scripting, concept development, character design, storyboarding, prompt generation, image and video generation, self-critique, and revision. Autonomously. 

The angles, the edits, the pacing decisions, the agent makes them.

The outputs? Short clips, yes. But also five-minute films generated in a single pipeline pass.

Another studio, UTOPAI, just released PAI 2.0 with an explicit mission: to help catalyze a "Claude Code moment" for media generation. They said it themselves. The metaphor is becoming an industry standard.

This is what vibe-contenting looks like. You stop directing. You start briefing.

With vibe-coding, the intermediate layer is code. Text. You can review it, diff it, commit it, roll it back. The interface is a text editor. Imperfect, but functional.

Anthropic just made this even more structured. Their new CLI, ant, lets you define agents in YAML files, version control them, deploy through CI/CD, and roll back if something breaks. Vibe-coding now has real software infrastructure underneath it.

Vibe-contenting has none of that.

The intermediate layer is a mess of scripts, mood boards, character sheets, storyboards, reference images, audio files, and video clips. All of which need to stay in sync with each other and with the original creative intent.

There is no standard interface for this. Nobody has built the right UX yet.

The person who figures out how to display the full state of a video agent's creative context, in a way that's reviewable, adjustable, and resumable, is going to build something worth a lot of money.

Right now, the bottleneck in vibe-contenting isn't generation quality. It's interpretability. 

Can you actually see what the agent is thinking? Can you course-correct without restarting? Can you inject a reference and have the agent understand what you mean?

If you're a creator: the barrier to video production is collapsing faster than most people realize. A solo creator with a well-written brief and access to these tools can now produce what previously required a team of 8. That's not a threat; it's leverage. But only if you develop the taste to brief well.

If you're a builder: the generation layer is commoditizing fast. OCTO, PAI, Google Flow, Higgs Super Computer, they're all converging on the same thing. The differentiation will come from context management, creative consistency, and UX for review and revision.

If you're a marketer or brand: TikTok is about to drown in AI micro-dramas. Scroll fatigue is coming. The brands that win won't be the ones generating the most content. They'll be the ones generating content that feels the most human. Which means the brief, the taste, and the editorial judgment behind the agent become the competitive moat.

The tools are ready. The workflows are proving out. The UX can be better.

That's where the opportunity is.

Who's building in this space? I'm genuinely curious. Reply and tell me what you're working on or experimenting with.

- Aashish

Your docs have more contributors than ever. Engineers, PMs, support, marketing, and now AI agents. But most documentation tools force a choice: an accessible editor for the whole team, or the rigor of git-based version control for developers. That tradeoff slows everyone down.

Mintlify's editor removes the tradeoff. Writers get a visual WYSIWYG experience with slash commands and editable navigation. Developers keep their git-native workflow. Every visual edit is a clean commit, every commit appears in the editor. Changes flow both ways.

The editor also brings live collaboration and AI agents as first-class contributors:

The best documentation is written by everyone who has context. That's your whole team. And now, your agents. Try it at mintlify.com.

Score your docs!